As part of our business plan and feasibility study services,
we do a lot of competitive analysis across sectors. Today, we have tried to
collate these learnings into this blog so that it can help consultants and
analysts to do it better. What we have done here is to bring out 2 different
matrix and discuss about them. The table below is a mapping that we did for a client
who are into restoration of furniture and interiors. A strategy we generally
take when doing competition analysis is to check whether we have the
opportunity to do an apple-to-apple comparison with the competition. Also we
check that how much information we can get about each of the parameters that we
have considered. Sometimes we also try to do a scoring on the competition that
also gives us a clear picture on the standing of a competitor vis-à-vis the
client. What we do not see in the table below is future roadmap of the clients
or the competitors. This is a parameter that we occasionally try to incorporate
into the analysis as it gives us a good idea on the road ahead of the competition.
Another very important aspect is the pricing strategy of the
competition. The pricing strategy determines how you should create the pricing
strategy of your products. Whether, it should be a premium product or placed in
the midmarket segment or the lower end of the market depends on the pricing strategy
that is adopted by the competition.
Table 1
Figure 2
The picture above, is another format for doing a comparison
analysis. It is quite exhaustive and analysts can choose to delete the sections
which they do not want to use.
It has become remarkably difficult to distinguish direct
competitors from indirect threats - and when you do, you find competition often
comes from surprising places. In fact, competition in different industries is
increasingly coming from indirect competitors, whose core businesses enable them
to invade adjacent verticals and industries.
Limiting your organization to direct competitors only might
lead you to a very narrow view of the market. The competition framework should allow
you to evaluate companies that aren’t just your direct competitors but
companies that could easily move into your turf. You want to consider companies
that aren’t currently in your category but could potentially leverage their
product or technology in your space.
Outside of direct competition, the most dangerous competitors
are those that sell to the same target customer. These companies already have
access to customers so it’s much easier for them to provide products or
services that solve another problem for the same customers.
When you are starting a competition analysis, some of the key
factors that you should focus on are number of customers, market share,
organization strengths and weaknesses, age of the competitor, possible growth
etc. Infact, there is no limit to the depth of which you can take your
competition analysis to.
While it is always important to know the competition, it is
equally important that we should not make any attempts to copy the competition.
Rather, you should focus on better quality products, innovation and related
factors that can make your products or services more acceptable to the
customers. At the end of the day, no matter how much you map competition, it is
your product that will either be accepted or rejected by the customers.
Developing a competition
analysis requires specific skillset that many companies do not have. Connect
with us at info@intelligentq.co.in
so that we can help you create an indepth competitive research so that you can
know your competition better.
COMMENT(S)
LEAVE A REPLY